There are two kinds of people who use Messenger – those who are ‘there’ all the time, and those who sign-on when they are there. I used to be the latter, and then a friend convinced me to be the former. That was about 2 years ago. Now I’m starting to wonder why I’m doing it. I’m rarely ‘there’ when signed-on so what’s the point? Messages will be delivered to me the next time I sign on (so they say). Plus my computer runs much better without Messenger being on. Add to this the fact that my friend recently decided to no longer use Messenger when he’s not at work, and most of my other friends can just be called on the phone….well the choice is obvious. So I’ll leave it to the fates to decide if we’ll meet up in Messenger (for those of you in Europe I still really enjoy our chats but we’ll have to just hope for the best – the time difference being what it is). Doug, I’ll try to catch you on a specific time either Saturdays or Sundays. Just send me an email close to the end of the week and I’ll be sure to find you…
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Aug | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | |||||
| 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
| 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
| 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
Wh|te Russian Said:
on September 4, 2007 at 8:01 am
“Messages will be delivered to me the next time I sign on (so they say).”
You said it just there.
That feature didn’t exist 2 years ago.
0penb00k Said:
on September 4, 2007 at 10:21 am
I may have to re-think my decision as there seems to be some sort of issue signing-in to Messenger. It usually takes about half an hour for me to get signed-in and that leads to some serious, serious frustration. I’ve checked all the things they said to check and there is nothing wrong on my end. This just goes to show that you can’t get something for free (at least not anything good).